Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907366›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Infectiousness to sand flies of a cat naturally infected with Leishmania infantum at the moment of diagnosis and after three different courses of treatment.

Mariana Dantas da Silva, Andrea Cristina Higa Nakaghi, Fredy Galvis-Ovallos, João Augusto Franco Leonel, Geovanna Vioti, Eunice Aparecida Bianchi Galati, Nayara Cristina de Oliveira Fazolato, Julia Pinho Martins, Trícia Maria Ferreira de Sousa Oliveira

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariana Dantas da SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Andrea Cristina Higa NakaghiUniversidade de Sorocaba - UNISO, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil.
Fredy Galvis-OvallosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
João Augusto Franco LeonelPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia e Saúde Única, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Geovanna ViotiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia e Saúde Única, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Eunice Aparecida Bianchi GalatiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Nayara Cristina de Oliveira FazolatoUniversidade de Sorocaba - UNISO, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil.
Julia Pinho MartinsDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, Pirassununga, SP, Brasil.
Trícia Maria Ferreira de Sousa OliveiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia e Saúde Única, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-3600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, an evaluation was made of three treatments against feline leishmaniosis (FeL) and their impacts on the transmission of Leishmania infantum to its vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis. A cat with clinical signs of FeL was examined and L. infantum diagnosed. Subsequently, the cat was subjected to xenodiagnosis and L. infantum detected in the vectors. The cat was then treated with three different drugs and the clinical improvement and parasite transmissibility to the vector were evaluated. Promastigotes were observed in 21/52 female sandflies (40.38%) in a xenodiagnosis prior to the treatments. Clinical signs persisted after the first treatment with marbofloxacin, and the cat remained positive in serological, molecular, and parasitological tests. Therefore, the cat was treated with miltefosine but remained sick and tested positive. A second xenodiagnosis was performed a month after treatment with miltefosine, and promastigotes were observed in 5/9 females (55.55%). Lastly, the cat was treated with allopurinol, which led to good clinical improvement, but it remained positive, and a final xenodiagnosis revealed Leishmania in 2/29 (6.89%) females. The results showed that only treatment with allopurinol produced a good clinical response, but none of the treatments succeeded in eliminating L. infantum infection or preventing transmission to the vector.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralPsychodidaeAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsCatsFemaleAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID39907366
PMCPMC11801251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.