ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
A Deep-Learning Model for Multi-class Audio Classification of Vocal Fold Pathologies in Office Stroboscopy.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early Detection of Glottic Cancer Through Machine Learning and Acoustic Voice Analysis: A Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond fingerprint and voice print: cough sequence sound for identity verification.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- A Multimodal Approach for Deep-Learning Classification of Vocal Fold Pathologies in Stroboscopy.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Decoding Gender in Cough Sounds: A Transformer-Based Analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Voice Disorders: Current Landscape, Emerging Applications and Future Directions.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a deep-learning classifier trained on voice data extracted from videolaryngostroboscopy recordings, differentiating between three different vocal fold (VF) states: healthy (HVF), unilateral paralysis (UVFP), and VF lesions, including benign and malignant pathologies.
methodsPatients with UVFP (n = 105), VF lesions (n = 63), and HVF (n = 41) were retrospectively identified. Voice samples were extracted from stroboscopic videos (Pentax Laryngeal Strobe Model 9400), including sustained /i/ phonation, pitch glide, and /i/ sniff task. Extracted audio files were converted into Mel-spectrograms. Voice samples were independently divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%) by patient. Pretrained ResNet18 models were trained to classify (1) HVF and pathological VF (lesions and UVFP), and (2) HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions. Both classifiers were further validated on an external dataset consisting of 12 UVFP, 13 VF lesions, and 15 HVF patients. Model performances were evaluated by accuracy and F1-score.
resultsWhen evaluated on a hold-out test set, the binary classifier demonstrated stronger performance compared to the multi-class classifier (accuracy 83% vs. 40%; F1-score 0.90 vs. 0.36). When evaluated on an external dataset, the binary classifier achieved an accuracy of 63% and F1-score of 0.48, compared to 35% and 0.25 for the multi-class classifier.
conclusionsDeep-learning classifiers differentiating HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions were developed using voice data from stroboscopic videos. Although healthy and pathological voice were differentiated with moderate accuracy, multi-class classification lowered model performance. The model performed poorly on an external dataset. Voice captured in stroboscopic videos may have limited diagnostic value, though further studies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 135:2428-2436, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.