ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2025
Stakeholder-informed refinement of a behavioral sleep/circadian intervention for gynecologic cancer survivors: an application of the MOST preparation phase.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cuidando Juntos: A Culturally Adapted Psychoeducation Program for Latino Dementia Caregivers.Clinical gerontologistArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep disturbance is among the most frequent and distressing symptoms reported by gynecologic cancer survivors. Existing evidence-based behavioral sleep interventions are limited by implementation burden, which can decrease adherence. PURPOSE: As part of the preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), this study solicited stakeholder feedback to maximize adherence in a planned behavioral sleep/circadian intervention optimization trial.
methodsThirteen post-treatment survivors of early-stage gynecologic cancer completed the protocol for the planned optimization trial, including simultaneous receipt of all candidate intervention components. This included six weeks of combined sleep restriction, stimulus control, and systematic exposure to morning bright light. Participants then completed a semi-structured interview to provide feedback on their experience. We used a rapid analytic approach to quickly identify actionable feedback from de-identified transcripts.
resultsParticipants generally reacted positively to the intervention components. Actionable feedback identified recommended protocol modifications and was categorized into four overarching themes: (i) remove barriers to engagement; (ii) revise for clarity; (iii) augment content; and (iv) consider individual circumstances.
conclusionsRapid qualitative analysis enabled us to effectively modify our planned study protocol on an expedited timeline. This approach is consistent with the core principles of MOST and can be incorporated into the Preparation phase to enhance optimization efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.