ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Deep Learning-Based Accelerated MR Cholangiopancreatography Without Fully-Sampled Data.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D and 4D Free-Breathing Abdominal T1-Weighted MRI in Clinical Practice Using Deep Learning Auto-Navigation and Reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot Self-Supervised Learning of Single Breath-Hold Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of deep learning accelerated 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T.European journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Personalized Medical Approach in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to accelerate MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) acquisitions using deep learning-based (DL) reconstruction at 3 and 0.55 T. A total of 35 healthy volunteers underwent conventional twofold accelerated MRCP scans at field strengths of 3 and 0.55 T. We trained DL reconstructions using two different training strategies, supervised (SV) and self-supervised (SSV), with retrospectively sixfold undersampled data obtained at 3 T. We then evaluated the DL reconstructions against standard techniques, parallel imaging (PI) and compressed sensing (CS), focusing on peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) as metrics. We also tested DL reconstructions with prospectively accelerated acquisitions and evaluated their robustness when changing fields strengths from 3 to 0.55 T. DL reconstructions demonstrated a reduction in average acquisition time from 599/542 to 255/180 s for MRCP at 3 T/0.55 T. In both retrospective and prospective undersampling, PSNR and SSIM of DL reconstructions were higher than those of PI and CS. At the same time, DL reconstructions preserved the image quality of undersampled data, including sharpness and the visibility of hepatobiliary ducts. In addition, both DL approaches produced high-quality reconstructions at 0.55 T. In summary, DL reconstructions trained for highly accelerated MRCP enabled a reduction in acquisition time by a factor of 2.4/3.0 at 3 T/0.55 T while maintaining the image quality of conventional acquisitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.