Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907172›Full record

ReviewBrain and behavior2025

Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms.

Narjes Soltani Dehaghani, Mojtaba Zarei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narjes Soltani DehaghaniInstitute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba ZareiInstitute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-3139

Funding

Lundbeck Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHumans obtain most of their information from visual stimuli. The perception of these stimuli may be modulated by the ongoing pre-stimulus brain activities. Depending on the task design, the processing of different cognitive functions such as spatial attention, feature-based attention, temporal attention, arousal, and mental imagery may start prior to the stimulus onset.

methodThis process is typically accompanied by changes in pre-stimulus oscillatory activities including power, phase, or connectivity in different frequency bands. To explain the effect of these changes, several mechanisms have been proposed. In this article, we review these changes and the potential mechanisms in the context of the pre-stimulus enabled cognitive functions. We provide evidence both in favor of and against the most documented mechanisms and conclude that no single mechanism can solely delineate the effects of pre-stimulus brain activities on later processing. Instead, multiple mechanisms may work in tandem to guide pre-stimulus brain activities. FINDING: Additionally, our findings indicate that in many studies a combination of these cognitive functions begins prior to stimulus onset.

conclusionThus, dissociating these cognitive functions is challenging based on the current literature, and the need for precise task designs in later studies to differentiate between them is crucial.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainCognitionVisual PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansPhotic Stimulationarousalbrain oscillationscognitive functionsfeature‐based attentionmental imagerypre‐stimulus activitiesspatial attentiontemporal attention

Identifiers

PMID39907172
PMCPMC11795279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.