Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907158›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational health2025

Health effects of indium compounds in animal experiments.

Akiyo Tanaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Akiyo TanakaCenter of Plasma Nano-Interface Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-6062-5313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before 2000, very little attention had been paid to the health effects of indium, a rare metal, because there was very little information in the literature on its toxicity. A fatal case of indium-tin oxide (ITO) inhalation occurred in 2001, followed by concerns regarding occupational exposure to indium compounds and their health effects. Epidemiological studies and case reports have established a causal relationship between the inhalation of insoluble indium compounds, mainly ITO, and the development of lung damage. This review focuses on the results of animal studies of ITO and other insoluble indium compounds. Available data indicate that insoluble indium compounds such as ITO, indium arsenide (InAs), indium phosphide (InP), and copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) solar cell materials are toxic to the lungs of animals. In addition to lung damage, ITO nanoparticles have been found to cause kidney damage, whereas InAs, InP, and ITO cause testicular damage. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence for the carcinogenic potential of InP in long-term inhalation studies using rats and mice, which was evident in rats exposed to ITO. Based on the results of these animal experiments, the International Agency for Research on Cancer evaluated InP as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A) and ITO as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2 B). Based on the results of animal studies, it should be noted that occupational exposure of humans to insoluble indium compounds not only may cause lung damage, but also lung carcinogenesis and kidney or testicular damage in the future. Greater attention should be directed towards human occupational exposure to insoluble indium compounds.

Indexed as

IndiumOccupational ExposureAnimal ExperimentationAnimalsHumansInhalation ExposureLungMicePhosphinesRatsTin CompoundsIndiumindium phosphideindium tin oxidePhosphinesTin Compoundsanimal studycarcinogenicityindium compoundsindium-tin oxidepulmonary toxicityrenal toxicity

Identifiers

PMID39907158
PMCPMC11894926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.