Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907105›Full record

Trial reportClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Walk-and-Talk Therapy Versus Conventional Indoor Therapy for Men With Low Mood: A Randomised Pilot Study.

Andrea Dickmeyer, Jordan J Smith, Sean Halpin, Stacey McMullen, Ryan Drew, Philip Morgan, Sarah Valkenborghs, Frances Kay-Lambkin, Myles D Young

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea DickmeyerSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2215-5182
Jordan J SmithCentre for Active Living and Learning, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Sean HalpinSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Stacey McMullenSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Ryan DrewCentre for Active Living and Learning, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Philip MorganCentre for Active Living and Learning, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah ValkenborghsCentre for Active Living and Learning, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Frances Kay-LambkinHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Myles D YoungSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Internal University of Newcastle Cross-College Support Grant 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While psychotherapy is effective for treating depression, men are less likely than women to attend and more likely to drop out. The value of alternative therapeutic approaches for men needs to be investigated. In this randomised pilot trial, we investigated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of outdoor 'walk-and-talk' therapy compared to conventional indoor therapy for 37 men with low mood (mean [SD] PHQ-9 score = 11.4 [5.0]; mean [SD] age = 44.1 [15.8] years). Over 6 weeks at the University of Newcastle participants received weekly 60-min sessions delivered (i) while walking along a 4-km route on campus or (ii) indoors in a psychology clinic, delivered by provisional psychologists using non-directive supportive counselling. Outcomes included validated measures of depression, anxiety, stress and overall psychological distress, male-type depression, mental well-being, behavioural activation and therapeutic alliance. At post-intervention, all pre-registered feasibility benchmarks were exceeded including recruitment capability, retention (89%), average attendance (walk-and-talk: 91%, indoor: 89%), proportion of sessions delivered in intended setting (walk-and-talk: 100%, indoor: 98%) and overall perceived acceptability of the therapy (walk-and-talk: 4.4/5, indoor: 4.2/5, where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent). Linear mixed model analysis demonstrated both groups achieved similar improvements in depressive symptoms (d = -0.02), but the walk-and-talk group reported greater improvements in overall psychological distress (d = -0.5), anxiety (d = -0.4) and stress (d = -0.7). In contrast, male-type depression improved more in the conventional indoor group (d = 0.6). Other outcomes were comparable between groups. Results indicate that walk-and-talk therapy may be acceptable and effective for men with depression. A powered trial to interrogate these effects and identify moderators of effectiveness is warranted. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12622001318774.

Indexed as

DepressionPsychotherapyWalkingAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment Outcomemalesoutdoor therapyphysical activitypsychotherapyrandomised trial

Identifiers

PMID39907105
PMCPMC11795730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.