Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907052›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

Query Mix-Max Method for FDR Estimation Supported by Entrapment Queries.

Dominik Madej, Henry Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominik MadejDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2474-1466
Henry LamDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-0364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating the false discovery rate (FDR) is one of the key steps in ensuring appropriate error control in the analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Traditional estimation methods typically rely on decoy sequence databases or spectral libraries, which may not always provide satisfactory results due to limitations of decoy construction methods. This study introduces the query mix-max (QMM) method, a decoy-free alternative for FDR estimation in proteomics. The QMM framework builds upon the existing mix-max procedure but replaces decoy matches with entrapment queries to estimate the number of false positive discoveries. Through simulations and real data set analyses, the QMM method was demonstrated to provide reasonably accurate FDR estimation across various scenarios, particularly when smaller sample-to-entrapment spectra ratios were achieved. The QMM method tends to be conservatively biased, particularly at higher FDR values, which can ensure stringent FDR control. While flexible, the protocol's effectiveness may vary depending on the evolutionary distance between the sample and entrapment organisms. It also requires a sufficient number of entrapment queries to provide stable FDR estimates, especially for low FDR values. Despite these limitations, the QMM method is a promising alternative as one of the first query-based FDR estimation approaches in shotgun proteomics.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinFalse Positive ReactionsHumansSoftwareentrapment databaseentrapment queryfalse discovery ratepeptide identificationshotgun proteomics

Identifiers

PMID39907052
PMCPMC11894652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.