SynthesisAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2025
Surgical Management of Moderate to Severe Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure at Emergency Department Arrival and Time to Bleeding Cessation in Adult Non-Traumatic Epistaxis: A Retrospective Time-to-Event Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes of blue light laser therapy for epistaxis in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia within a multimodal treatment concept.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpistaxis is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), significantly impacting patients' quality of life. While various medical and surgical interventions exist for managing epistaxis in patients with HHT, patients with moderate to severe epistaxis are high health-care utilizers who frequently need surgical treatment.
objectiveTo compare the efficacy, complications, and patient-reported outcomes for common surgical interventions utilized in treating epistaxis in patients with HHT.
methodsStudies were identified in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Redalyc, and LILACS databases and uploaded to Covidence. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on studies evaluating outcomes in adults with HHT with moderate to severe epistaxis who had undergone surgical interventions. We compared the respective outcomes for pre-operative and post-operative epistaxis severity/intensity, need for further interventions or transfusions, estimated blood loss, length of surgery, complications, and patient satisfaction.
resultsTwenty studies with a total of 546 patients were included. The most common surgeries studied were nasal closure and laser photocoagulation. Seven studies recorded the change in epistaxis severity score and observed a significant reduction postoperatively (3.91, [95% CI 2.73-5.09]). Eleven studies found a decrease in the number of transfusions and a rise in hemoglobin levels post-operatively. Common complications reported were partial dehiscence of a nasal closure, septal perforation, and continued bleeding requiring re-operation. Most patients report improved quality of life and satisfaction with surgical intervention.
conclusionSurgery can significantly reduce the severity of epistaxis in patients with HHT and improve quality of life. Further studies should focus on head-to-head comparisons of procedures and standardization of outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.