ArticleHeliyon2025
A mixed-method investigation of the root causes of construction project delays in Afghanistan.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Construction projects in Afghanistan are plagued by significant delays, hindering development efforts and incurring substantial economic losses. Currently, a staggering 79 % of projects experience delays, contributing to a critical infrastructure gap in the nation. This research delves into the root causes of these delays, examining their impact on project outcomes and identifying potential mitigation strategies. By considering the perspectives of five key stakeholder groups-clients, consultants, contractors, project managers, and lecturers-the study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of the causes contributing to delays. A comparative analysis with other conflict-affected countries, such as Ukraine, Pakistan, Palestine, and Iraq, reveals both shared and unique challenges that hinder construction projects in these regions. The research findings highlight the significant impact of security challenges, corruption, and logistical hurdles on construction project delays in Afghanistan. Tailored strategies are essential to address these multifaceted issues and improve project outcomes. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to bolster the performance of Afghanistan's construction sector. A key contribution of this research is its novel focus on security-related causes of construction project delays. By explicitly examining and ranking these causes, the study advances our understanding of how security challenges influence project timelines, a previously underexplored area. Additionally, the comparison with other conflict-affected regions lays the groundwork for broader comparisons and the identification of global best practices. Construction project delays in Afghanistan are influenced by a complex interplay of causes, including security challenges, corruption, and logistical hurdles. Tailored strategies are essential to address these multifaceted issues and improve project outcomes. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to bolster the performance of Afghanistan's construction sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.