Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906853›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2025

A comprehensive narrative review exploring the current landscape of digital complete denture technology and advancements.

Chan Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chan ParkDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article comprehensively discusses the various treatment protocols and fabrication methods for complete digital dentures and focuses on systematic classification of the techniques introduced in the literature. The treatment protocols are based on conventional procedures, highlighting the areas where digital technologies can be utilized and their advantages. Particularly, it emphasizes the benefits of overcoming time and spatial limitations, along with advantages of permanent data storage. The limitations of digital technologies and potential solutions are also addressed. Current methods and alternatives for patient information acquisition, a common concern among many dentists, are presented. The fabrication methods are categorized into two main manufacturing techniques: milling and three-dimensional (3D) printing. Under the premise of advanced milling technology and limited printing capabilities, their advantages, disadvantages, and applications are compared. Novel hybrid technologies combining both methods are introduced, including challenging aspects of metal framework integration. By examining the complete digital denture fabrication and treatment process from start to finish, this article aims to discuss the present and future of digitally integrated treatment methods.

Indexed as

3D printingCAD/CAMDigital denture

Identifiers

PMID39906853
PMCPMC11791138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.