ArticleHeliyon2025
Deep learning-based system for prediction of work at height in construction site.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Falling from height (FFH) is a major cause of injuries and fatalities on construction sites. Research has emphasized the role of technological advances in managing FFH safety risks. In this investigation, the objective is to forecast if a laborer is operating at an elevated position by utilizing an accelerometer, gyroscope, and pressure information through the application of deep-learning techniques. The study involved analyzing worker data to quickly implement safety measures for working at heights. A total of 45 analyses were conducted using DNN, CNN, and LSTM deep-learning models, with 5 different window sizes and 3 different overlap rates. The analysis revealed that the DNN model, utilizing a 1-s window size and a 75 % overlap rate, attained an accuracy of 94.6 % with a loss of 0.1445. Conversely, the CNN model, employing a 5-s window size and a 75 % overlap rate, demonstrated an accuracy of 94.9 % with a loss of 0.1696. The results of this study address information gaps by efficiently predicting workers' working conditions at heights without the need for complex calculations. By implementing this method at construction sites, it is expected to reduce the risk of FFH and align occupational health and safety practices with technological advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.