Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Inflammatory burden index as a prognostic marker in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Jiao-Bao Huang, Zhi-Yong Zhou, Jun Lu, Ji-Yun Zhu, Bin Lai, Sheng-Xun Mao, Jia-Qing Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use of antihistamine and antihistamine-like drugs for cancer-related pain: a narrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiao-Bao HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhi-Yong ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ji-Yun ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Bin LaiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Sheng-Xun MaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jia-Qing CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Blood inflammation index has been shown to correlate with the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However, few studies have compared the efficacy of existing blood inflammatory markers in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of existing commonly used blood inflammatory index in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of patients with advanced gastric cancer from three centers in China were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate COX regression analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors of poor tumor regression and overall survival (OS) in this part of patients, and the predictive value of different inflammatory indexes on prognosis was compared by C-index index. Finally, Inflammatory burden index(IBI) was grouped by X-tile software, and Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival difference between groups. Results: A total of 163 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 63 years(56-68). The median cycle of neoadjuvant therapy was 4(3-4). The median survival time was 85.1%(1 years), 65.6%(2 years), and 47.4%(3 years).Univariate analysis showed that IBI was an independent risk factor for non-TR(residual tumor cells>50%) (HR=1.08,95%CI:1.00-1.45,p<0.001)and OS(HR=1.04,95%CI:1.03-1.05,p<0.001). IBI is the best predictor of OS (C-index: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87) among all inflammatory indexes. The IBI cutoff value was 52.1. It was found that the high IBI group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications(32.1%vs14.3%, p=0.001), the proportion of non-TR patients was significantly higher than that of the low IBI group(64.3%vs35.7%, p =0.001), and the high IBI group had a significantly lower OS((47.6% vs 87.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: IBI is the best inflammatory index to predict the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, which will help guide patients' treatment decisions. This result still needs to be verified by large prospective studies.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyInflammationStomach NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumorgastric cancerimmunotherapyinflammatory indexneoadjuvant therapyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39906738
PMCPMC11790653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.