ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Predictors of outcomes of conservative management in chronic coccydynia - Results from a prospective clinicoradiological observational study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Coccydynia.Neurospine · 2026Review
- Management strategies of pediatric coccydynia: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study background: Chronic coccydynia is a difficult pathology to treat due to limited understanding of the etiology and risk factors. Aim of the study was to analyse the clinical and radiological factors associated with poor outcomes in coccydynia. Study design: Prospective observational study. Methods: Patients who visited the spine outpatient department between September 2019 to August 2021 with coccygeal pain of more than two months were included in the study. Lateral radiographs in seated and standing position were done to evaluate their Intercoccygeal angle (ICA), Sacrococcygeal angle (SCA), Basal Angle (BA) and Coccygeal Length. MRI was done for patients who were not relieved with 2 months of conservative treatment. Baseline VAS and ODI scores were documented at the first visit and at six months follow-up to evaluate the outcomes. Results: 168 patients were included - 106 females and 62 males (M:F ratio 1.76) with a mean age of 41.71 years. 109 out of 168 (64.9 %) were obese and 31(18.5 %) were overweight. Type 2 and 4 coccyges were the most commonly seen morphology (67 patients each). Traumatic coccydynia had a better outcome with a mean VAS score of 3.54 compared to 4.36 in the idiopathic group(p < 0.05). Higher Intercoccygeal angle (ICA) was the only radiographic parameter that had coorelation with the outcomes. Mean ICA in good outcomes group was 34.8° (13.2) compared to 42.1° (14.6) in those with poor outcomes(p < 0.05). All 7 patients with pseudoarthrosis had VAS scores reduction of more than 50 %. Conclusion: Type 2 and type 4 were the most common coccyx morphology encountered in patients with chronic coccydynia. Outcomes were better in traumatic group compared to idiopathic group and in those with pseudoarthrosis on MRI. Higher Intercoccygeal angle(ICA) was the only radiographic parameter associated with poor outcome of conservative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.