ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Traditional Chinese medicine manual therapy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic outcomes of stick-assisted manipulation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study of 57 patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical study on the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by balanced jar therapy with flexible corrective appropriate technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Biomechanical characteristics and therapeutic effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine manual therapy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- International survey on the management of pectus excavatum: is there a consensus?Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- The traditional Chinese medicine manipulation combined with Schroth exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This case demonstrates the efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine manual therapy (TCMMT) for the treatment of mild to moderate AIS. Methods: An 10-year-old girl who suffered from low back pain (LBP) with marked shoulder inequality and razorback postural abnormalities, with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis, and the Cobb angle of 20° and angle of trunk rotation (ATR) of the thoracic vertebral segment at 7°, and ATR of the lumbar vertebral segment at 8°, was treated with TCMMT. The patient initially recovered from centralized LBP with repeated TCMMT twice per week for 1 month. Subsequently, the frequency of TCMMT treatment was changed to 1-2 sessions weekly for 6 months. Before treatment, after the first TCMMT, 1 month and 7 months of treatment, and 18 months of follow-up, we used ATR or Cobb angle and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for assessment. The HRQOL was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was used to assess the effectiveness of clinical measures based on a "responder analysis". Results: (a) The patient's VAS score was 40/100 before treatment, 25/100 after the first treatment, 15/100 after 1 month of treatment, 12/100 after 7 months of treatment, and 15/100 at follow-up to 18 months. (b) The patient's SRS-22 score was 54/110 before treatment, 61/110 after the first treatment, 79/110 after 1 month of treatment, 106/110 after 7 months of treatment, and 104/110 at follow-up to 18 months. (c) Before treatment, the patient's thoracic ATR angle was 7° and the lumbar ATR angle was 8°, there was no change in the ATR angles of the thoracic and lumbar spine after the first treatment. The thoracic ATR angle was 6° and the lumbar ATR angle was 5° after 1 month of treatment. The thoracic ATR angle was 1.5° and the lumbar ATR angle was 3.5° after 7 months of treatment. The thoracic ATR angle was 2° and the lumbar ATR angle was 4° at the follow up till 18 months. (d) The patient's Cobb angle was 20° before treatment, 7° after the 7 month of treatment, and 8° at follow-up to 18 months. No adverse events during treatment. Conclusions: TCMMT is a conservative treatment option worthy of consideration when considering a conservative treatment strategy for AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.