ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Assessment of Pain Perception of Aesthetic Procedures During Menstrual Period in Comparison to Non- Menstrual Period days.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Compound Lidocaine Cream and Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain Management in Facial Rejuvenation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aimed to investigate the influence of the menstrual cycle on pain perception during non-surgical aesthetic procedures. The study explored the correlation between different phases of the menstrual cycle, the presence of premenstrual symptoms, and the severity of pain experienced by participants. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted at dermatology clinics in Saudi Arabia. 383 complete responses were collected from participants who provided data on demographic factors, aesthetic procedures, menstrual status, premenstrual symptoms, and pain severity. Results: The 383 participants reported that the most frequent procedures were laser hair removal (82.5%) and injectables. Pain perception was highest for laser hair removal across all menstrual phases (4.5±2.66, 4.8±3.06 and 4.3±3.48), and lowest for Ultherapy (1.56±1.66, 1.40±1.36 and 1.37±1.37). Significant positive correlations were found between premenstrual symptom severity and pain perception in laser hair removal and injectables. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant negative association between age and pain perception in laser hair removal, while age had a positive association with other procedures. Conclusion: In conclusion, pain perception during non-surgical aesthetic procedures varies across menstrual phases and is influenced by the type of procedure. The negative relationship between age and pain in laser hair removal requires further research. These findings can help practitioners better manage patient expectations and experiences during these cosmetic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.