Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906669›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

Management of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and expert consensus in Australia.

P Joy Ho, Hang Quach, M Hasib Sidiqi, Cindy H Lee, Jason Butler, Andrew Spencer, Kenneth Micklethwaite, Jingya Li, Elissa Cusson, Robert Bagnall and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

P Joy HoInstitute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hang QuachDepartment of Hematology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
M Hasib SidiqiCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Cindy H LeeDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jason ButlerDepartment of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Andrew SpencerDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kenneth MicklethwaiteBlood Transplant and Cell Therapies Program, Department of Haematology, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Jingya LiHealth Economics and Market Access, Amaris Consulting, Shanghai, China.
Elissa CussonHealth Economics and Market Access, Amaris Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert BagnallHealth Economics and Market Access, Amaris Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.
Simon J HarrisonClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regulatory bodies have recently approved chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but the treatment process involves complex decision making. To support the introduction of these therapies, we aimed to establish consensus expert opinion on best practices of all aspects of the management of patients with MM undergoing CAR-T cell therapy in Australia. Methods: We conducted a modified RAND/UCLA two-round Delphi panel informed by a systematic literature review (SLR). The SLR included evidence from clinical practice guidelines, interventional trials, and observational studies for CAR-T cell therapy for patients with MM, to synthesize methodological aspects of CAR-T cell therapy related to patient management. The Delphi panel comprised eight hematologists from across Australia, each with significant experience directly treating patients using CAR-T therapy or referring patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Panelists completed the surveys electronically, and attended a virtual meeting held before the second-round questionnaire to discuss the first-round questionnaire responses. Consensus was defined Results: The SLR identified 22 interventional or observational studies and 5 clinical practice guidelines reporting on selection and management of patients with MM treated with CAR-T cell therapy from various global regions. The Delphi panel reached consensus on practices related to patient referral, screening, selection, prioritization, treatments requiring wash-out, bridging therapy, lymphodepletion, infusion, and post-infusion monitoring and management. Most consensus results aligned with consistently recommended practices within guidelines included in the SLR. Consensus was not reached for statements related to specific screening practices and post-treatment monitoring, suggesting differing opinions on the specific best practices to implement. Conclusion: Our Delphi panel established expert consensus on key considerations for patient selection, administrative processes, and aftercare for patients with MM in Australia undergoing CAR-T therapy. This will guide the development of clinical practice guidelines which are relevant and feasible to Australian health systems.

Indexed as

AustraliaCAR-T cell therapychimeric antigen receptor immunotherapyconsensus developmentDelphi studymultiple myelomasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39906669
PMCPMC11790593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.