ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The evolution of cell-free fetal DNA testing: expanded non-invasive prenatal testing and its effect on target populations.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complementary Diagnostic Roles of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Chromosomal Microarray Analysis, and Karyotyping in 14,011 High-Risk Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Combined Analyses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Preliminary Comparison of a Modified cfDNA Extraction Protocol for Y-Chromosome Marker Detection in Maternal Plasma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Residual risk of clinically significant copy number variations in fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers following exclusion of non-invasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies and copy-number variations in 9,708 pregnancies.Molecular cytogenetics · 2026Article
- Analysis of diagnostic consistency rate and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with high-risk NIPT undergoing transabdominal amniocentesis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- A prospective study of non-invasive prenatal screening technology in preimplantation genetic testing cycles.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Nursing Students toward Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Fetal Anomaly Scan.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-plus) in screening for fetal chromosome aneuploidy and copy number variations (CNVs) among pregnant women with different risk factors to investigate how the target population of cell-free fetal DNA may change in NIPT-plus. Methods: The clinical data, test results, confirmatory invasive testing outcomes, and follow-up results of 6,220 pregnant women who underwent NIPT-plus were re-viewed. The performance indicators of the positive predictive value (PPV), positive rate (PR), specificity, and sensitivity in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal abnormalities (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs), and CNVs were calculated. The PR or PPV of NIPT-plus for screening chromosome aneuploidy and CNVs in women of varying ages, risk factors, and clinical indications were determined. Results: The PRs of common trisomies, SCAs, RAAs, and CNVs in NIPT-plus were 0.71, 0.45, 0.32, and 0.59%, respectively, with 100% sensitivity and specificities ranging from 99.69 to 99.87%. The PPVs were 80.95, 30.77, 13.33, and 44.12%, respectively. The high-risk group had higher PRs and PPVs for chromosome aneuploidy, with no significant difference in screening for CNVs. NIPT-plus showed greater PR for aneuploidy in the older age group than in the younger age group, with no significant differences in CNVs screening. Conclusion: NIPT-plus was able to effectively screen for chromosome aneuploidy and CNVs. The performance of CNVs screening was not significantly different among different risk factors and age groups. The target population for NIPT-plus should include all pregnant women, not just those at high risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.