Genetic structure and common ancestry expose the dingo-dog hybrid myth.

The evolutionary history of canids has been shown to be complex, with hybridization and domestication confounding our understanding of speciation among various canid lineages. The dingo is a recent canid lineage that was completely isolated from other canids for over 5000 years on the Australian mainland, but the introduction of domestic dogs in 1788 has placed doubt on its independence, with recent studies highlighting hybridization between dingoes and domestic dogs. Using genomic single nucleotide polymorphism data from 434 Australian canid samples, we explicitly test for introgression between closely related canid groups and dingoes. We found no evidence of introgression between dingoes and domestic dogs and show that previous work has likely mischaracterized shared ancestral genetic variation as evidence for hybridization. Further, New Guinea Singing Dogs are the only canid group that significantly shared genetic variation with dingoes, which fits with our understanding of previous phylogenetic analyses. Despite more recent sympatric distributions with dogs, dingoes have likely maintained their independence since their arrival in Australia, even in areas with high lethal control, indicating that their evolutionary trajectory is currently being conserved. The future conservation of the dingo lineage will require policies that promote coexistence pathways between humans and dingoes that protect rangeland systems and the dingoes' evolutionary future.