ArticleEvolution letters2025
Disentangling evolutionary, geometric and ecological components of the elevational gradient of diversity.
Article in Evolution letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the high importance and risk of mountain ecosystems in global biodiversity conservation, the mechanisms giving rise to and maintaining elevational biodiversity gradients are poorly understood, limiting predictions of future responses. Species richness peaks at lowlands for many taxa, which might be a consequence of mountain shape, reducing available area in highlands. For other taxa, diversity can be highest at mid elevations, suggesting the presence of mechanisms that counteract the influence of geometry. Here, we mechanistically investigate the role of mountain geometry (smaller at the peak) interaction with ecological niche width, diversification, and altitudinal dispersal to investigate the relative roles of these processes in shaping elevational biodiversity gradients. We simulated landscapes and lineages until species richness stop increasing and showed that the disproportionately large area of lowlands provides opportunity for higher species accumulation than any other elevation, even when available niche width and per-capita diversification rate are uniform across altitudes. Regardless of the underlying Elevational Diversity Gradient, altitudinal dispersal always plays a stronger role in maintaining highland than lowland diversity, due to unequal areas involved. To empirically test these predictions resulting from our model, we fit dynamic models of diversification and altitudinal dispersal to three mountainous endemic radiations whose species richness peaks in mid and high-elevation. We find that highland diversity is explained by increased diversification rates with elevation in Fijian bees, whereas niche availability is more likely to explain high altitude diversity in frailejon bushes and earless frogs, suggesting these clades are still growing. Our model and findings provide a new framework for distinguishing drivers of diversity dynamics on mountainsides and allow to detect the presence of clade-specific mechanisms underlying the geometry-diversity relationship. Understanding of these ecological and evolutionary forces can allow increased predictability of how ongoing land use and climate changes will impact future highland biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.