Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906558›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Mind wandering enhances statistical learning.

Teodóra Vékony, Bence C Farkas, Bianka Brezóczki, Matthias Mittner, Gábor Csifcsák, Péter Simor, Dezső Németh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teodóra VékonyCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, INSERM, CRNS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69500 Bron, France.
Bence C FarkasUVSQ, INSERM, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, 94807 Villejuif, France.
Bianka BrezóczkiDoctoral School of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.
Matthias MittnerDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Gábor CsifcsákDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Péter SimorInstitute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.
Dezső NémethCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, INSERM, CRNS, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69500 Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain spends 30-50% of its waking hours engaged in mind-wandering (MW), a common phenomenon in which individuals either spontaneously or deliberately shift their attention away from external tasks to task-unrelated internal thoughts. Despite the significant amount of time dedicated to MW, its underlying reasons remain unexplained. Our pre-registered study investigates the potential adaptive aspects of MW, particularly its role in predictive processes measured by statistical learning. We simultaneously assessed visuomotor task performance as well as the capability to extract probabilistic information from the environment while assessing task focus (on-task vs. MW). We found that MW was associated with enhanced extraction of hidden, but predictable patterns. This finding suggests that MW may have functional relevance in human cognition by shaping behavior and predictive processes. Overall, our results highlight the importance of considering the adaptive aspects of MW, and its potential to enhance certain fundamental cognitive abilities.

Indexed as

Psychology

Identifiers

PMID39906558
PMCPMC11791256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.