ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Diagnostic efficiency of exome-based sequencing in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric and visualized analysis of current advances and future directions in epilepsy: from molecular basis to therapy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- The genetic architecture of epilepsy across molecular mechanisms and clinical heterogeneity.Epilepsia open · 2026Review
- Clinical utility and genetic landscape of exome sequencing in a large pediatric epilepsy cohort: Insights from a Turkish tertiary care center.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Review
- Early-Onset and Syndromic Pediatric Epilepsy in Kazakhstan: Clinical, Molecular, and Phenotypic Spectrum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical and genetics spectrum of 392 Chinese patients with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Mastering genetics for your clinic: A step-by-step guide.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Linking Genotype to Clinical Features inGenes · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Epilepsy, a prevalent neurological disorder, has multifaceted etiologies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a robust diagnostic tool for this condition. This study aims to evaluate the detection efficiencies of different exome-based sequencing techniques. Methods: Exome-based epilepsy panel tests, clinical exome sequencing (CES), and whole exome sequencing (WES) were conducted on 259 pediatric patients diagnosed with epilepsy. Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs) were interpreted based on each patient's phenotypic presentation. Additionally, data concerning clinical symptoms, neuroimaging findings, treatment responses, and prognostic outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: The overall diagnostic yield was 32.8% (85/259), with a diagnostic yield of 40.0% for exome-based epilepsy panels, 30.1% for CES, and 27.8% for WES. We identified 82 cases with pathogenic or likely pathogenic SNVs and 4 cases with pathogenic CNVs, of which one case with both SNV and CNV. The most frequently detected gene was PRRT2, present in 10.0% (9/82) of cases. Epileptic syndromes were diagnosed in 66 patients, predominantly West Syndrome, Dravet Syndrome and Genetic Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures plus. Conclusion: NGS is an effective method for uncovering the genetic foundations of pediatric epilepsy, with diagnostic yields varying based on the sequencing approach used. The growing preference for WES underscores its utility in complex cases, pointing to a trend towards more tailored diagnostic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.