ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Qualitative analysis to explore the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of automated dispensing cabinets at a large NHS Trust in England.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated dispensing cabinets and nurse-related medication errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Review
- The use of automated dispensing cabinets in hospitals.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) as a tool to store and manage medication are becoming more widely used in healthcare settings. Although there is literature surrounding their effectiveness at reducing medication error and time for nursing and pharmacy staff, there is little information on how to implement ADCs on a large scale in a busy working clinical environment. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively determine the enablers and barriers to the implementation of ADCs in a hospital setting. Methods: Participants were selected through purposeful sampling and invited to attend online focus groups and interviews via Microsoft Teams. These were recorded and transcribed. Two facilitators independently reviewed the transcriptions, coded and developed themes using Nvivo. Results: There were 18 participants that took part in four focus groups and three interviews. These participants were from the pharmacy department, nursing, estates and the external porter company used for medication and supply. Nine themes and 31 sub-themes were identified from the data. The nine themes were; overall thoughts, strategy of implementation, stakeholder engagement, training, workflow changes, environment, evaluation, challenges and solutions to challenges. Conclusion: This study has provided new insight into the required elements for implementing a large scale piece of new technology into a hospital setting. The data complemented other studies such as the challenges with staff training and the importance of ongoing optimisation of the ADCs post implementation. Key recommendations for others looking to implement ADCs include utilising videos and written materials for training early on and including nursing staff in the core project implementation team as well introducing mock cabinets for staff to practice on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.