ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2025
Real-Time Gastric Juice Analysis to Rule Out the Presence of Autoimmune Gastritis: A Case-Control Study.
Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is an infrequent disease predisposing to both neuroendocrine tumours and cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether pH measurement of gastric juice allows accurate exclusion of the presence of AIG in real time so that gastric mucosa sampling on normal-appearing mucosa may be avoided. Methods: This study enrolled patients diagnosed with AIG and matched controls (ratio 1:5) who underwent upper endoscopy with standard gastric mucosa sampling and real-time, gastric juice pH assessment. A threshold of pH less than 4.5 was adopted as cut-off to rule out the presence of a feature of AIG. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were calculated. Results: Data of 40 patients (M/F: 19/21; mean age: 58 years, range: 18-89) with AIG and 212 matched controls were evaluated. Among AIG patients, the feature of atrophy/metaplasia of the oxyntic mucosa was staged as mild in 9 cases, moderate in 9, and severe in the remaining 22 patients. Gastric juice analysis showed a pH value >4.5 in 29 (72.5%) patients and 12 (5.7%) controls. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, LR+, and LR- were 73% (95% CI = 0.57-0.84), 94% (95% CI = 0.90-0.97), 71% (95% CI = 0.64-0.74), 95% (95% CI = 0.93-0.97), 91% (95% CI = 0.87-0.95), 12.9 (95% CI = 7.19-23.03), and 0.29 (95% CI = 0.18-0.48), respectively. The histological assessment of false-negative cases showed the presence of only mild-moderate atrophy of oxyntic mucosa in 6 (54.5%) cases, and severe in the others. Conclusions: Our data found that real-time pH evaluation of gastric juice allows ruling out AIG with a very high NPV, but further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.