ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Tailoring convolutional neural networks for custom botanical data.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailoring convolutional neural networks for custom botanical data.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
- Improving computer vision for plant pathology through advanced training techniques.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Automated disease, weed, and crop classification with computer vision will be invaluable in the future of agriculture. However, existing model architectures like ResNet, EfficientNet, and ConvNeXt often underperform on smaller, specialised datasets typical of such projects. Methods: We address this gap with informed data collection and the development of a new convolutional neural network architecture, PhytNet. Utilising a novel dataset of infrared cocoa tree images, we demonstrate PhytNet's development and compare its performance with existing architectures. Data collection was informed by spectroscopy data, which provided useful insights into the spectral characteristics of cocoa trees. Cocoa was chosen as a focal species due to the diverse pathology of its diseases, which pose significant challenges for detection. Results: ResNet18 showed some signs of overfitting, while EfficientNet variants showed distinct signs of overfitting. By contrast, PhytNet displayed excellent attention to relevant features, almost no overfitting, and an exceptionally low computation cost of 1.19 GFLOPS. Conclusions: We show that PhytNet is a promising candidate for rapid disease or plant classification and for precise localisation of disease symptoms for autonomous systems. We also show that the most informative light spectra for detecting cocoa disease are outside the visible spectrum and that efforts to detect disease in cocoa should be focused on local symptoms, rather than the systemic effects of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.