Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906492›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

From phylogenomics to breeding: Can universal target capture probes be used in the development of SNP markers for kinship analysis?

Kedra M Ousmael, Ole K Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kedra M OusmaelDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management University of Copenhagen Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-6560
Ole K HansenDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management University of Copenhagen Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Leveraging DNA markers, particularly single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), in parentage analysis, sib-ship reconstruction, and genomic relatedness analysis can enhance plant breeding efficiency. However, the limited availability of genomic information, confined to the most commonly used species, hinders the broader application of SNPs in species of lower economic interest (e.g., most tree species). We explored the possibility of using universal target capture probes, namely Angiosperms353, to identify SNPs and assess their effectiveness in genomic relatedness analysis. Methods: We tested the approach in 11 tree species, six of which had a half-sib family structure. Variants were called within species, and genomic relatedness analysis was conducted in species with two or more families. Scalability via amplicon sequencing was tested by designing primers and testing them in silico. Results: Adequate SNPs for relatedness analysis were identified in all species. Relatedness values from Angiosperms353-based SNPs highly correlated with those from thousands of genome-wide DArTseq SNPs in Discussion: Utilizing universal target capture probes for SNP identification can help overcome the limitations of genomic information availability, thereby enhancing the application of genomic markers in breeding plant species with lower economic interest.

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingAngiosperms353relatedness analysisSNP developmenttargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39906492
PMCPMC11788909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.