Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906490›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Ensemble automated approaches for producing high-quality herbarium digital records.

Robert P Guralnick, Raphael LaFrance, Julie M Allen, Michael W Denslow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert P GuralnickFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-1504
Raphael LaFranceFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
Julie M AllenDepartment of Biological Sciences VirginiaTech Blacksburg Virginia USA.
Michael W DenslowFlorida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: One of the slowest steps in digitizing natural history collections is converting labels associated with specimens into a digital data record usable for collections management and research. Here, we address how herbarium specimen labels can be converted into digital data records via extraction into standardized Darwin Core fields. Methods: We first showcase the development of a rule-based approach and compare outcomes with a large language model-based approach, in particular ChatGPT4. We next quantified omission and commission error rates across target fields for a set of labels transcribed using optical character recognition (OCR) for both approaches. For example, we find that ChatGPT4 often creates field names that are not Darwin Core compliant while rule-based approaches often have high commission error rates. Results: Our results suggest that these approaches each have different strengths and limitations. We therefore developed an ensemble approach that leverages the strengths of each individual method and documented that ensembling strongly reduced overall information extraction errors. Discussion: This work shows that an ensemble approach has particular value for creating high-quality digital data records, even for complicated label content. While human validation is still needed to ensure the best possible quality, automated approaches can speed digitization of herbarium specimen labels and are likely to be broadly usable for all natural history collection types.

Indexed as

ChatGPTdigitizationensemble methodsinformation extractionlarge language modelsmachine learningnatural history collectionsnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39906490
PMCPMC11788903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.