Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906386›Full record

ReviewChemical science2025

Unifying principles for the design and evaluation of natural product-inspired compound collections.

Frederik Simonsen Bro, Luca Laraia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frederik Simonsen BroDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark 2800 Kongens Lyngby Denmark luclar@kemi.dtu.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7149-9246
Luca LaraiaDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark 2800 Kongens Lyngby Denmark luclar@kemi.dtu.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6692-3412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products play a major role in the discovery of novel bioactive compounds. In this regard, the synthesis of natural product-inspired and -derived analogues is an active field that is further developing. Several strategies and principles for the design of such compounds have been developed to streamline their access and synthesis. This perspective describes how individual strategies or their elements can be combined depending on the project goal. Illustrative examples are shown that demonstrate the blurred lines between approaches and how they can work in concert to discover new biologically active molecules. Lastly, a general set of guidelines for choosing an appropriate strategy combination for the specific purpose is presented.

Identifiers

PMID39906386
PMCPMC11788825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.