ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Epidemiology of Lyme Disease as Identified Through Electronic Health Records in a Large Midwestern Health System, 2016-2019.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Findings From Electronic Medical Record Review of 2500 Patients Identified With Lyme Disease Diagnoses, Test Orders, and Antibiotic Orders in the SubLyme Network.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Using Electronic Health Records to Enhance Lyme Disease Surveillance: Protocol for the SubLyme Network.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Exploring data-driven algorithms to identify Lyme disease cases in electronic health records.PloS one · 2026Article
- Lyme Disease Testing Practices, Wisconsin, USA, 2016-2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Computerised decision support system towards informing Lyme borreliosis incidence in France.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States; however, its frequency is not reliably measured through surveillance. Electronic health records (EHR) might capture the frequency and characteristics of Lyme disease cases more accurately. We queried EHR from 1 health system to describe the epidemiology of Lyme disease cases in Wisconsin during 2016-2019. Methods: Within a cohort of persons evaluated for Lyme disease, we applied a Lyme disease case definition based on first-line antibiotics within 14 days of a Lyme disease diagnosis code or test order or on the same day as a related keyword in clinical notes. We compared characteristics of cases to those of cases reported through surveillance and reviewed medical charts to assess case definition validity. Results: Among 67 289 possible Lyme disease events in the cohort, 13 494 (20.1%) met our Lyme disease case definition. Cases were more common among males, children 5-9 years, older adults, White non-Hispanic persons, and in the summer months. EHR-based Lyme disease incidence was 4-8 times that reported through surveillance. The EHR definition had moderately high sensitivity (83.4%) and specificity (71.1%) for confirmed and probable Lyme disease. Conclusions: EHR queries show promise to capture the incidence of Lyme disease more completely and provide more robust clinical information than public health surveillance. Demographic and seasonal characteristics of EHR-identified cases were comparable to those identified through surveillance. Further algorithm refinement might improve accuracy of measuring Lyme disease in EHR systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.