Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906289›Full record

ReviewIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2025

Biomedical Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks Revisited.

Pelin Sezgin, Ezgi Gulcay-Ozcan, Marija Vučkovski, Aleksandra M Bondžić, Ilknur Erucar, Seda Keskin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Therapeutic Gases in Biomedicine: Updates on Nitric Oxide and Beyond.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biomedical Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks Revisited.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pelin SezginKoç University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ezgi Gulcay-OzcanSabanci University, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul 34956, Turkey.
Marija VučkovskiVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6743-8320
Aleksandra M BondžićVinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-2318
Ilknur ErucarOzyegin University, Department of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, 34794 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-6067
Seda KeskinKoç University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-0336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been shown to be great alternatives to traditional porous materials in various chemical applications, and they have been very widely studied for biomedical applications in the past decade specifically for drug storage. After our review published in 2011 [Keskin and Kızılel,

Identifiers

PMID39906289
PMCPMC11789151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.