ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
From homogeneity to heterogeneity: Refining stochastic simulations of gene regulation.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exact Formula of the Total Quasi-Steady State Approximation in Competitive Target-Mediated Drug Disposition.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Optimizing enzyme inhibition analysis: precise estimation with a single inhibitor concentration.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular processes are intricately controlled through gene regulation, which is significantly influenced by intrinsic noise due to the small number of molecules involved. The Gillespie algorithm, a widely used stochastic simulation method, is pervasively employed to model these systems. However, this algorithm typically assumes that DNA is homogeneously distributed throughout the nucleus, which is not realistic. In this study, we evaluated whether stochastic simulations based on the assumption of spatial homogeneity can accurately capture the dynamics of gene regulation. Our findings indicate that when transcription factors diffuse slowly, these simulations fail to accurately capture gene expression, highlighting the necessity to account for spatial heterogeneity. However, incorporating spatial heterogeneity considerably increases computational time. To address this, we explored various stochastic quasi-steady-state approximations (QSSAs) that simplify the model and reduce simulation time. While both the stochastic total quasi-steady state approximation (stQSSA) and the stochastic low-state quasi-steady-state approximation (slQSSA) reduced simulation time, only the slQSSA provided an accurate model reduction. Our study underscores the importance of utilizing appropriate methods for efficient and accurate stochastic simulations of gene regulatory dynamics, especially when incorporating spatial heterogeneity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.