Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906088›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine2024

Comparing intra-uterine injection of mononuclear cells and platelet-rich plasma on the pregnancy rate of women with recurrent implantation failure: An RCT.

Hoda Fazaeli, Azar Sheikholeslami, Zahra Ebrahimi, Naser Kalhor, Leila Naserpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of reproductive biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hoda FazaeliDepartment of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research (ACECR), Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Azar SheikholeslamiDepartment of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research (ACECR), Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Zahra EbrahimiDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research (ACECR), Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Naser KalhorDepartment of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research (ACECR), Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Leila NaserpourDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research (ACECR), Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) can be explained mainly by improper crosstalk between the embryo and endometrium. The T-helper1/T-helper2 profile balance influences effective embryo implantation. Endometrial immunomodulation via intrauterine injection of activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potentially efficient treatment option. Objective: This study aims to examine the biochemical and clinical pregnancies resulting from the intrauterine administering of activated PBMCs and PRP in RIF women. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was done in the Rooya Infertility Treatment Center, Qom, Iran from November 2022 to April 2024. 96 women with at least 2 RIFs were randomized into control, PBMC, and PRP groups. Briefly, 3 ml of blood sample was collected and PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll separation solution, and cultured for 72 hr. PRP was separated from 10 ml of peripheral blood through centrifugation. 2 days before embryo transfer PBMCs or PRP were transferred into the endometrial cavity. Results: Except for the duration of infertility, which was higher in the PBMC group, all other baseline characteristics were not statistically different. Moreover, a significantly higher rate of biochemical pregnancy was observed in the PRP (10/32) and PBMC (12/32) groups compared to the control (3/32) (p = 0.027), while the rate of clinical pregnancy was only significantly higher in the PBMC group (10/32) than in the control group (2/32) (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Neither PBMC nor PRP interventions exhibited a substantial advantage over one another regarding biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates.

Indexed as

Peripheral blood mononuclear cellsPlatelet-rich plasmaPregnancy.Recurrent implantation failure

Identifiers

PMID39906088
PMCPMC11788656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.