Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39906080›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2025

Transforming Education: Case-Based Integrated Learning Development and Implementation - A Mixed Methods Study at a Private Medical College.

Rahila Ali, Azam Afzal, Sara Shakil, Amber Sultan, Shazia Babar, Javeria Rehman, Marib Ghulam Rasool Malik, Mohammad Shahzaib Qadir, Sadaf Khan, Sana Saeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rahila AliDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Azam AfzalDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sara ShakilDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Amber SultanDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shazia BabarDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Javeria RehmanDepartment of Educational Development, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Marib Ghulam Rasool MalikDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad Shahzaib QadirMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sadaf KhanDepartment of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sana SaeedDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in medical education to bridge theory and practice, but traditional methods often struggle to sustain student engagement and promote critical thinking. To address these challenges, Case-Based Integrated Learning (CBIL) was developed as a novel approach combining immersive and interactive learning techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CBIL in enhancing engagement, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning among medical students, and explore faculty experiences regarding the pedagogy. Methods: An explanatory-sequential mixed-methods study was conducted in a private medical college in Pakistan. Quantitative data were collected through faculty (n=35) and student (n=122) evaluation surveys, and analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequencies, and percentages). Qualitative data from focused group discussions (FGD) with faculty were analyzed thematically. A committee of clinical faculty and medical educationists developed four CBIL prototypes. Faculty from various clinical specialties were trained on CBIL concepts and lesson planning, and the prototypes were used to develop engaging cases for subsequent sessions. Participants included faculty from diverse disciplines and students in their third and fourth years of medical school. Results: The faculty considered the training very effective (overall satisfaction 5.17±0.89 out of 6), with a vast majority being very satisfied with its relevance (86%, n=30) and structure (91%, n=32). Among students, 95% (n=116) were satisfied with the developed cases. Most of them were also satisfied with the clarity (92%, n=112) and applicability of the cases (96%, n=117). In FGD, facilitators expressed satisfaction with CBIL formats as it provided opportunities for engagement, in-depth analyses, and discussions. Conclusion: Interactive formats like CBIL can engage students by allowing opportunities for interaction, discussion, and peer-learning. This promotes improved understanding and critical thinking. Further exploration of the effectiveness and impacts on the learning of various interactive formats of case-based learning is essential.

Indexed as

Clinical clerkshipsContinuing educationEducationProfessional educationUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID39906080
PMCPMC11788772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.