ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2025
Examining the Use of Machine Learning Algorithms to Enhance the Pediatric Triaging Approach.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical accuracy and applications of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in emergency care: a narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Triage systems play a vital role in effectively prioritizing patients according to the seriousness of their condition. However, conventional emergency triage systems in pediatric care predominantly rely on subjective evaluations. Machine learning technologies have shown significant potential in various medical fields, including pediatric emergency medicine. Therefore, this study seeks to employ pediatric emergency department records to train machine learning algorithms and evaluate their effectiveness and outcomes in the triaging system. This model will improve accuracy in pediatric emergency triage by categorizing cases into three urgency levels (nonurgent, urgent, and emergency). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study that used emergency patient records obtained from the Emergency Department at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre. Using the emergency severity index (a scale of 1 to 5), various machine learning techniques were employed to build different machine learning models, such as regression, instance-based, regularization, tree-based, Bayesian, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble algorithms. The accuracy of these models was compared to reach the most accurate and precise model. Results: A total of 38,891 pediatric emergency patient records were collected. However, due to numerous outliers and incorrectly labeled data, clinical knowledge and a confident learning algorithm were employed to preprocess the dataset, leaving 18,237 patient records. Notably, ensemble algorithms surpassed other models in all evaluation metrics, with CatBoost achieving an F-1 score of 90%. Importantly, the model never misclassified an urgent patient as nonurgent or vice versa. Conclusion: The study successfully created a machine learning model to classify pediatric emergency department patients into three urgency levels. The model, tailored to the specific needs of pediatric patients, shows promise in improving triage accuracy and patient care in pediatric emergency departments. The implication of this model in the real-life sitting will increase the accuracy of the pediatric emergency triage and will reduce the possibilities of over or under triaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.