Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905984›Full record

Observational studyJournal of renal care2025

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring During 52 Hours in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Haemodialysis Treatment-An Exploratory Pilot Study.

Jenny Stenberg, Oskar Sandberg, Kerstin Marttala, Maria K Svensson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of renal care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny StenbergDepartment of Medical Sciences, Renal Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-0087
Oskar SandbergDepartment of Medical Sciences, Renal Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5016-4756
Kerstin MarttalaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Renal Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2934-8713
Maria K SvenssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Renal Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-5585

Funding

The study was supported by the Uppsala University Hospital ALF grants and establishment funding (MKS), the CUWX Foundation and The Swedish Kidney Foundation, Swedish National Strategic Research Initiative EXODIAB (Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden), and the Family Ernfors Foundation.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension in patients with haemodialysis is mainly characterised by high pre-dialysis blood pressure (BP) due to body fluid retention before dialysis, and the BP tends to decrease after dialysis due to removal of water during dialysis. Intervals between haemodialysis treatments vary and a long inter-dialytic interval dialysis is associated with increased mortality.

objectiveTo examine variations in BP; how ambulatory BP vary during a dialysis treatment performed after the long inter-dialytic interval, that is, the first treatment of the week, compared to dialysis after a short inter-dialytic interval, and in the interval between the two dialysis sessions.

designExploratory non-interventional observational.

participantsEleven patients with chronic kidney disease Stage 5 treated with haemodialysis were enroled. The mean age was 69 years (range 48-87) and mean dialysis duration 65 months (range 4-128). MEASUREMENTS: Ambulatory BP was recorded for 52 h including two haemodialysis treatments and one inter-dialytic interval. For statistical analyses the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used.

resultsSignificant differences in systolic and diastolic BPs were observed between dialyses after long inter-dialytic interval and short inter-dialytic interval, respectively (systolic 122 mmHg vs. 114 mmHg, p = 0.012 and diastolic 62 mmHg vs. 61 mmHg, p = 0.036). In addition, the BP declined during the first 90 min during dialysis in both settings.

conclusionsMeasuring ambulatory BP for 52 h in patient with chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis is feasible and show that both systolic and diastolic BP differ between dialysis treatments following inter-dialytic intervals of diverse length. These findings should be replicated in larger studies.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTime Factorsambulatory blood pressurechronic kidney diseasedialytic intervalhaemodialysis

Identifiers

PMID39905984
PMCPMC11795226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.