ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Combination Therapy with Atropine 0.05% and Myopi-X
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of atropine 0.05% eye drops versus placebo on controlling myopia progression among school children in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- The Evolution of Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses in Türkiye.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- 0.01% atropine combined with carteolol hydrochloride can inhibit the scleral remodeling in guinea pigs with form-deprivation myopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Myopi-X lenses vs. low-dose atropine in myopia control: a Turkish retrospective study : Study design: retrospective observational study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether the combination therapy of Myopi-X Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed the clinical records of 51 patients, categorized into three groups: 27 in the Myopi-X group, 13 in the atropine 0.05% group, and 11 in the combination therapy group using Myopi-X peripheral PAL with atropine 0.05%. Baseline characteristics, including age, cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), and axial length (AL), were compared between the groups. Twelve months after treatment initiation, changes in SE and AL were assessed and compared between the groups. Results: Among the 51 patients analyzed, the baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups, with the atropine 0.05% group showing a higher average age, longer AL, and lower SE compared to the other groups. After 12 months, no significant differences were found in SE changes between the treatment groups (p=0.35). Similarly, changes in AL did not significantly differ between the groups (p=0.10), although age had a significant impact on AL change (p=0.01). No significant differences were observed in pairwise comparisons of SE or AL changes between the groups. Conclusion: In this study, combining atropine 0.05% with Myopi-X PALs did not provide an additive benefit. The literature suggests that both treatments are effective in slowing myopia progression individually; however, in our study, their combination did not significantly improve SE progression or axial elongation compared to monotherapies. Further randomized studies with larger patient groups are needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.