Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905960›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025

Strategies for Sustainability and Cost Optimization in Corneal Transplantation: From Surgeons’ Perspective

Pelin Kıyat, Melis Palamar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pelin Kıyatİzmir Democracy University, Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-3581-7059
Melis PalamarEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0002-2494-0131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of surgical strategies that can be implemented in keratoplasty to maximize resource utilization and enhance sustainability. To achieve this, we conducted a thorough search of PubMed to identify articles on sustainability and cost-effectiveness in surgical settings, as well as studies comparing the cost-effectiveness of different keratoplasty techniques. Our review shows that both penetrating keratoplasty and lamellar techniques are cost-effective. However, lamellar techniques offer greater long-term sustainability and cost efficiency in addition to improving patient vision. For corneal transplantation surgeries, strategies such as reducing operating room time, properly educating the surgical team, reusing instruments like trephines and punches, using surgical materials economically, and selecting the appropriate surgical technique are recommended to enhance sustainability and reduce costs. The strategies outlined could contribute to more sustainable practices in keratoplasty procedures. In conclusion, although ensuring the economical use of surgical materials is beneficial for improving sustainability and reducing costs during surgery, utmost care should be taken to preserve safety and effectiveness while taking measures to reduce costs, and a balance should be achieved between sustainability and patient safety.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationHealth Care CostsSurgeonsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansCorneakeratoplastysustainability

Identifiers

PMID39905960
PMCPMC11866992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.