ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Strategies for Sustainability and Cost Optimization in Corneal Transplantation: From Surgeons’ Perspective
Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness, attitudes, and practices of environmental sustainability in ophthalmology: A national cross-sectional survey in Türkiye.Medicine · 2026Article
- Sustainable Ophthalmology Applications: From the Perspective of Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Analysis of sustainability strategies in cataract surgery and surgeon perspective in reducing carbon footprint.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of surgical strategies that can be implemented in keratoplasty to maximize resource utilization and enhance sustainability. To achieve this, we conducted a thorough search of PubMed to identify articles on sustainability and cost-effectiveness in surgical settings, as well as studies comparing the cost-effectiveness of different keratoplasty techniques. Our review shows that both penetrating keratoplasty and lamellar techniques are cost-effective. However, lamellar techniques offer greater long-term sustainability and cost efficiency in addition to improving patient vision. For corneal transplantation surgeries, strategies such as reducing operating room time, properly educating the surgical team, reusing instruments like trephines and punches, using surgical materials economically, and selecting the appropriate surgical technique are recommended to enhance sustainability and reduce costs. The strategies outlined could contribute to more sustainable practices in keratoplasty procedures. In conclusion, although ensuring the economical use of surgical materials is beneficial for improving sustainability and reducing costs during surgery, utmost care should be taken to preserve safety and effectiveness while taking measures to reduce costs, and a balance should be achieved between sustainability and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.