Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905949›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

PyViscount: Validating False Discovery Rate Estimation Methods via Random Search Space Partition.

Dominik Madej, Henry Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dominik MadejDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2474-1466
Henry LamDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-0364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validating false discovery rate (FDR) estimation is an essential but surprisingly understudied aspect of method development in shotgun proteomics. Currently available validation protocols mostly rely on ground truth data sets, which typically involve manipulating the properties of the search space or query spectra used. As a result, comparing estimated FDR and ground truth-based false discovery proportion values may not be representative of the scenarios involving natural data sets encountered in practice. In this study, we introduce PyViscount─a Python tool implementing a novel validation protocol based on random search space partition, which enables generating a quasi ground-truth using unaltered search spaces of unique candidate peptides and generic data sets of experimental query spectra. Furthermore, validation of existing FDR estimation methods by PyViscount is consistent with alternative validation protocols. The presented novel approach to validation free from the need for synthetic data sets or dubious manipulation of the data may be an attractive alternative for proteomics practitioners, allowing them to obtain deeper insights into the performance of existing and new FDR estimation methods.

Indexed as

ProteomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinPeptidesReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesfalse discovery ratepeptide identificationsearch space partitionshotgun proteomicsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39905949
PMCPMC11894659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.