ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2025
Segmentation of cortical bone, trabecular bone, and medullary pores from micro-CT images using 2D and 3D deep learning models.
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capturing the Multiscale Nature of Bone Behavior: Classical, Data-Driven and Hybrid Techniques.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Demystifying machine learning approaches in digital bone imaging using microCT and HRpQCT.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Segmentation of cortical bone, trabecular bone, and medullary pores from micro-CT images using 2D and 3D deep learning models.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025Article
- Advancements in High-Resolution Computed Tomography: Revolutionising Bone Health Micro-Research.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bone Evaluation with Micro Finite Element Analysis in Animal Models.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Review
- Deep learning software and revised 2D model to segment bone in micro-CT scans.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) enables rapid imaging of large-scale studies of bone, but those datasets typically require manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and prone to error. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer an automated solution, achieving superior performance on image data. In this methodology-focused paper, we used CNNs to train segmentation models from scratch on 2D and 3D patches from micro-CT scans of otter long bones. These new models, collectively called BONe (Bone One-shot Network), aimed to be fast and accurate, and we expected enhanced results from 3D training due to better spatial context. Contrary to expectations, 2D models performed slightly better than 3D models in labeling details such as thin trabecular bone. Although lacking in some detail, 3D models appeared to generalize better and predict smoother internal surfaces than 2D models. However, the massive computational costs of 3D models limit their scalability and practicality, leading us to recommend 2D models for bone segmentation. BONe models showed potential for broader applications with variation in performance across species and scan quality. Notably, BONe models demonstrated promising results on skull segmentation, suggesting their potential utility beyond long bones with further refinement and fine-tuning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.