Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905865›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025

Modelling extensions for multi-location studies in environmental epidemiology.

Pierre Masselot, Antonio Gasparrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierre MasselotEnvironment & Health Modelling (EHM) Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-1290
Antonio GasparriniEnvironment & Health Modelling (EHM) Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R013349/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-location studies are increasingly used in environmental epidemiology. Their application is supported by designs and statistical techniques developed in the last decades, which however have known limitations. In this contribution, we propose an improved modelling framework that addresses these issues. Specifically, this flexible framework allows the direct modelling of demographic differences across locations, defining geographical variations linked to multiple vulnerability factors, capturing spatial heterogeneity and predicting risks to new locations, and improving the assessment of uncertainty. We illustrate these new developments in an analysis of temperature-mortality associations in Italian cities, providing fully reproducible R code and data.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCitiesHumansItalyMortalityTemperatureEnvironmental epidemiologymeta-regressionspatial interpolationtime series

Identifiers

PMID39905865
PMCPMC11951449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.