ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
Students' Perceptions of Virtual Reality as Learning Tool in a Radiographic Technique Course.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of extended-reality technologies in the field of medical radiation.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Value-Based Healthcare-What Does it Look Like for Medical Radiation Sciences in the Australian Context?Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVirtual reality (VR) has been increasingly recognised as a beneficial pedagogical tool in radiography education, particularly for skills training. This pilot study aims to gain insight into the viability of VR as a pedagogical instrument in a radiographic technique course within a Norwegian bachelor's programme in radiography by assessing users' experiences.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving all first-year radiography students from a single bachelor programme in Norway. The study included a preliminary survey to gauge students' expectations prior to their first VR session and a main survey following the completion of the course. The surveys assessed demographics, prior VR experience, experiences with the use of VR as a learning tool and possible improvements. VR training was facilitated using Skilitics radiography simulation software across six stations equipped with Oculus Rift VR gear.
resultsResults indicated a significant difference between students' expectations and their actual experiences with VR in skills learning. While initial expectations were high, only 37% of students were content with VR training. Major issues highlighted included technical problems and limited pre-session training. Students expressed a preference for more VR stations, teacher guidance and better software features.
conclusionAlthough VR holds potential as a supplementary tool in radiography education, the study identified several areas for improvement in the pedagogical approach. Pre-session training, teacher assistance during the training sessions and feedback after the session are recommended to maximise the educational benefits of VR in radiography skills training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.