Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905701›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Setting Primary Health and Social Care Priorities Using a Deliberative Democratic Participatory Approach.

Coralie Wales, Penny Abbott, Jackie Street, Lauren Fawcett, Maree Jennings, Wendy Sharp, Philip Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Coralie WalesWestern Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-1897
Penny AbbottSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4865-4823
Jackie StreetSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1033-4341
Lauren FawcettRelationships to Partnerships Practitioner, WentWest, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Maree JenningsFirst Nations Community Facilitator, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Wendy SharpVolunteer Consumer Advisor, WentWest, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Philip LeeVolunteer Consumer Advisor, WentWest, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3689-8812

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work. However, WentWest provided funding as the host of the two citizens' juries. This funding included venue, stipends, catering and incidental costs to realise the two citizens' juries. Salaries for two of the research team (C.W. and L.F.) were paid by WentWest, whereas two scholars in the team were paid by their universities and one was paid as a consultant.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPublicly funded regional primary health care investments are usually informed by analysis of locally collected data, surveys, focus groups and consultations. We wanted a deeper understanding of baseline health and social care priorities in culturally diverse Western Sydney. If WentWest could understand the priorities, the operational agenda for commissioning services could be tailored around them. This research describes the organisation, conduct and recommendations of a citizens' jury in 2023.

methodsThematic analysis of the transcribed facilitated discussions identified the well-informed priorities of a diverse and representative group of Western Sydney citizens. Listening to internal and external advisory groups delivered communication pathways, expert presenters, handbook preparation and practical support for the jury event. Consistent with the principle that research about the community should include the community, four consumer advisors were colleagues in the research team.

resultsThe jury supported a focus on prevention, including early intervention to keep children thriving and connected at school, and better cross-sectoral bonds via coalitions to enable social care to be linked to health care. Team-based care in general practice for proactive data use and building a culture for relationship-based care, developing a patient-centred workforce through incentivising students and expediting registration of overseas trained health workers were recommended. Assets-based community development was seen as an essential approach in linking the community with these recommendations.

conclusionThe use of citizens' juries in primary health settings is rare. In this culturally diverse community, WentWest now has a foundational understanding of what investments will deliver and has committed to institutionalising this deliberative approach into a permanent citizens assembly. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The design of the jury was guided by several advisory groups across the local region. The research team included four consumer advisors to provide overarching feedback and external insights. The jurors were selected to be representative of the regional community. They developed the recommendations reported in this article.

trial registrationThis research does not involve clinical trials.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth PrioritiesPrimary Health CareFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleNew South Walescitizen's jurydeliberative methodsprimary healthsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39905701
PMCPMC11794238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.