Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905651›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2025

fMRI Activation in Sensorimotor Regions at 6 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Adam M Culiver, Dustin R Grooms, Jaclyn B Caccese, Scott M Hayes, Laura C Schmitt, James A Oñate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam M CuliverSports Medicine Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-6114
Dustin R GroomsDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6102-8224
Jaclyn B CacceseDivision of Athletic Training, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-3603
Scott M HayesChronic Brain Injury Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Laura C SchmittSports Medicine Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
James A OñateSports Medicine Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Contributions of modifiable physical attributes to cognitive and brain agingR01AG068882 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, SCOTT M · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR077896NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain activity during knee movements is altered throughout the sensorimotor network after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Patients at 2 to 5 years after surgery appear to require greater neural activity to perform basic knee movement patterns, but it is unclear if brain activity differences within sensorimotor regions are present early after surgery. It is also unknown whether uninvolved knee movements elicit similar or unique activity compared with involved knee movements. PURPOSE: To examine brain activity in sensorimotor regions during involved and uninvolved knee movements in patients at 6 weeks after ACLR compared with control participants. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

methodsA total of 15 patients who underwent ACLR (mean age, 21.9 ± 4.3 years [range, 17-29 years]; 8 female) and 15 control participants performed 30-second blocks of repeated knee flexion and extension, followed by 30 seconds of rest, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Regions of interest included the right and left primary motor cortex (M1), right and left primary somatosensory cortex (S1), supplementary motor area (SMA), precuneus, and lingual gyrus. Activity from task-relevant voxels (move > rest) was extracted, and generalized estimating equations evaluated the main effect of group and group-by-limb interaction. Effect sizes were calculated using the Cohen

resultsReduced brain activity during knee flexion and extension was observed in the ACLR group in the ipsilateral M1 and S1, contralateral S1, SMA, and precuneus during movements of the involved and uninvolved knees. There were no group-by-limb interaction effects, indicating no significant differences between the involved knee and uninvolved knee in the ACLR group. Medium to large effect sizes were identified for between-group differences in all regions.

conclusionAt 6 weeks after ACLR, patients exhibited bilateral reductions in brain activity during knee movements in multiple sensorimotor regions. These identified regions are associated with motor planning, motor execution, somatosensory function, and sensorimotor integration. These data indicate that ACLR affected sensorimotor brain activity in both limbs during the early postoperative phase of rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionKnee JointSensorimotor CortexAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKneeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexMovementSomatosensory CortexACLRfMRImotor controlrehabilitationsensorimotor network

Identifiers

PMID39905651
PMCPMC12273877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.