ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Paced Breathing Associated With Pupil Diameter Oscillations at the Same Rate and Reduced Lapses in Attention.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Rhythmic Embodied Perception Framework of breath, brain, and perception.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Review
- Sighs Shape Respiratory Variability and Pupil Dynamics and Adapt to Sustained Attention Demands.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- It's About Time-Breathing Dynamics Modulate Emotion and Cognition.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Arousal and sustained attention fluctuate differently with respiration in younger and older adults.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Oscillatory components of bidirectional cardio-respiratory coupling in depression and suicidal ideation: insights from swarm decomposition and entropy analysis.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A dynamical systems model proposes that respiratory, locus coeruleus-noradrenaline (LC-NA), and cortical attentional systems interact, producing emergent states of attention. We tested a prediction that fixing respiratory pace (versus spontaneous respiration) stabilizes oscillations in pupil diameter (LC-NA proxy) and attentional state. Primary comparisons were between 'Instructed Breath' (IB) and 'No Instructed Breath' (NIB) groups. Secondarily, we investigated the effects of shifting respiratory frequency in the IB group from 0.15 to 0.1-0.15 Hz in Experiment 1 (n = 55) and 0.15-0.1 Hz only in Experiment 2 (n = 48) (replication). In the Paced Auditory Cue Entrainment (PACE) task, participants heard two auditory tones, alternating higher and lower pitches, cycling continuously. Tones acted as a breath guide for IB and an attention monitor for both groups. Participants gave rhythmic mouse responses to the transition points between tones (left for high-to-low, right for low-to-high). We derived accuracy of mouse click timing (RTm), variability in click timing (RTVL), and counts of erroneously inverting the left/right rhythm (IRs and Switches). Despite no differences between groups in RTm or RTVL, IB committed significantly fewer IRs and switches, indicating less lapses in attention during paced breathing. Differences in behavioral metrics were present across tone cycle frequencies but not exclusive to IB, so breath frequency did not appear to have a specific effect. Pupil diameter oscillations in IB closely tracked the frequency of the instructed breathing, implicating LC-NA activity as being entrained by the breath intervention. We conclude that pacing respiratory frequency did stabilize attention, possibly through stabilizing fluctuations in LC-NA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.