SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Prothrombin complex concentrate for reversal of oral anticoagulants in patients with oral anticoagulation-related critical bleeding: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSwift reversal of oral anticoagulation is deemed essential for the outcome of patients with anticoagulation-related critical bleeding. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the benefits and harms of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in patients with oral anticoagulants-related critical bleeding.
methodsFor this systematic review CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched. Clinical study reports were also requested from competent authorities. Eligible for inclusion were randomised clinical trials comparing PCC versus no intervention, placebo, or other reversal interventions in participants with critical bleeding related to ongoing treatment with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Pre-specified primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, and serious adverse events for which meta-analyses, Trial Sequential Analysis, and GRADE assessments were conducted.
resultsThree trials, randomising a total of 291 participants, evaluated PCC against two different active comparators in participants with VKA-related critical bleeding, and two trials, randomising a total of 534 participants, evaluated PCC against two different active comparators in participants with factor Xa-related critical bleeding. Among participants with VKA-related critical bleeding, meta-analyses showed no evidence of a difference between PCC versus fresh frozen plasma (FFP) when assessing all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 4.05; low certainty), health-related quality of life (mean difference 1.04; 95% CI - 0.94 to 3.02; very low certainty), and serious adverse events (RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.88; very low certainty), but information is currently sparse. Among participants with factor Xa-related critical bleeding, PCC could not be shown superior or inferior to other reversal strategies (FFP or andexanet alfa) on any patient-relevant outcome, but information is currently sparse.
conclusionAmong participants with VKA or DOAC-related critical bleeding, evidence from randomised clinical trials is currently insufficient to establish if PCC is superior or inferior versus other interventions in decreasing the risk of undesirable patient-relevant outcomes or improving health-related quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.