Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905469›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2025

One-step diagnosis of infection and lung cancer using metagenomic sequencing.

Shaoqiang Li, Yangqing Zhan, Yan Wang, Weilong Li, Xidong Wang, Haoru Wang, Wenjun Sun, Xuefang Cao, Zhengtu Li, Feng Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaoqiang Li *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yangqing Zhan *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yan Wang *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Weilong LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xidong WangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Haoru WangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenjun SunState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xuefang CaoMatriDx Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, 311112, China.
Zhengtu LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. tu276025@163.com.
Feng YeState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. yefeng@gird.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program No. 2021YFC2301101National Natural Science Foundation of China 92048203the Science Foundation for the State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control of China No. 2022SKLID308Youth fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82100118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional detection methods face challenges in meeting the diverse clinical needs for diagnosing both lung cancer and infections within a single test. Onco-mNGS has emerged as a promising solution capable of accurately identifying infectious pathogens and tumors simultaneously. However, critical evidence is still lacking regarding its diagnostic performance in distinguishing between pulmonary infections, tumors, and non-infectious, non-tumor conditions in real clinical settings.

methodsIn this study, data were gathered from 223 participants presenting symptoms of lung infection or tumor who underwent Onco-mNGS testing. Patients were categorized into four groups based on clinical diagnoses: infection, tumor, tumor with infection, and non-infection-non-tumor. Comparisons were made across different groups, subtypes, and stages of lung cancer regarding copy number variation (CNV) patterns, microbiome compositions, and clinical detection indices.

resultsCompared to conventional infection testing methods, Onco-mNGS demonstrates superior infection detection performance, boasting a sensitivity of 81.82%, specificity of 72.55%, and an overall accuracy of 77.58%. In lung cancer diagnosis, Onco-mNGS showcases excellent diagnostic capabilities with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value reaching 88.46%, 100%, 91.41%, 100%, and 90.98%, respectively. In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples, these values stand at 87.5%, 100%, 94.74%, 100%, and 91.67%, respectively. Notably, more abundant CNV mutation types and higher mutation rates were observed in adenocarcinoma (ADC) compared to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Concurrently, onco-mNGS data revealed specific enrichment of Capnocytophaga sputigeria in the ADC group and Candida parapsilosis in the SCC group. These species exhibited significant correlations with C reaction protein (CRP) and CA153 values. Furthermore, Haemophilus influenzae was enriched in the early-stage SCC group and significantly associated with CRP values.

conclusionsOnco-mNGS has exhibited exceptional efficiencies in the detection and differentiation of infection and lung cancer. This study provides a novel technological option for achieving single-step precise and swift detection of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMetagenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBronchial lavage fluidClinical performanceInfection diagnosisLung cancer diagnosisOnco-mNGS

Identifiers

PMID39905469
PMCPMC11796122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.