Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905468›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Enhancing compassion in medical education - a comparative study of the efficacy of clinical clerkships versus simulation-based training methodologies.

Claudia Ebm, R Sarti, P Panico, M Pagliotta, V Vinci, S Oldani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07280689 (Mejorar la empatía Hacia el Mayor Mediante la simulación de la Vejez), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07280689 nacompletednot on this map

Mejorar la empatía Hacia el Mayor Mediante la simulación de la Vejez

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosRan2024 to 2024Enrolled82ConditionsAging, Empathy SkillsArmsExperimental: Aging Simulation Suit + Educational Session, Control: Educational Session Only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia EbmDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy. claudia.ebm@hunimed.eu.
R SartiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
P PanicoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
M PagliottaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
V VinciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
S OldaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompassionate behavior plays a crucial role in medicine by fostering patient-doctor relationships, enhancing adherence, and improving care quality. While partly innate, compassion can be significantly enhanced through structured educational interventions. Despite recent efforts to integrate compassion into medical curricula, methodological challenges persist, especially in understanding how different environments influence skill expression and development. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of traditional clinical clerkships versus simulation-based training in cultivating compassion skills among medical students.

methodsThis retrospective longitudinal study evaluated the professional behavior and cognitive skills of 133 medical students at Humanitas University, Milan, Italy, over a three-year period from 2021 to 2024. The curriculum emphasizes problem-based learning and professional development through hospital clerkships and simulation-based training. Compassion was assessed quarterly using a standardized scorecard and continuously evaluated via a learning management system, simulation scenarios and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs).

resultsIn the initial assessment, compassion scores showed no significant difference between the two settings (clerkship: 3.25 ± 0.73, simulation: 3.30 ± 0.69, p = 0.45). Over subsequent evaluations taking place in the following two years, the differences remained non-significant (p = 0.39, p = 0.22) until a notable divergence was observed in later assessments, particularly in the final evaluation at the end of 5th year study (clerkship: 3.54 ± 0.78, simulation: 3.23 ± 1.18, p = 0.023). Clerkship students demonstrated a significant increase in compassion scores over time (+ 0.29, p = 0.023), benefiting from immersive patient interactions that deepened their compassionate behavior. In contrast, simulation scores peaked slightly but not significantly in Year 4 before returning to initial levels (-0.07, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.11]), highlighting the challenge of sustaining compassionate behaviors without ongoing real-world practice.

conclusionThis study emphasizes the crucial role of deliberate curriculum design in medical education. While simulation-based training offers controlled environments, it incompletely replicates the emotional depth of real patient interactions crucial for sustaining compassion. Integrating compassion-focused training into medical curricula is essential for nurturing compassionate healthcare professionals, urging immediate action to enhance compassion in medical education.

trial registrationNot applicable. No health intervention has been proposed, and it's a purely retrospective analysis on an educational methodology.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipEmpathySimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesMalePhysician-Patient RelationsProblem-Based LearningRetrospective StudiesCompassionMedical studentsSimulation-based learningUndergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID39905468
PMCPMC11796239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.