SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Patient experience and burden of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study Design of the Global Prospective Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Registry (GERANIUM).American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- Understanding Patient Perspectives and Experiences in Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: Insights from Qualitative Interviews.AJP reports · 2026Article
- Characterization of the clinical course of early-onset severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- "Baby You're Just Not Right for Me": The Various Problems of Feto-Maternal Incompatibilities.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025Article
- Neonatal Hemolytic Jaundice: Causes, Diagnostic Approach, and Management.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) is an immune disorder driven by maternal alloimmunisation against foetal/newborn red blood cell antigens. HDFN can cause significant morbidity and mortality, with symptoms in the foetus ranging from mild anaemia to hydrops fetalis. While in newborns, HDFN can lead to severe forms of neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia and kernicterus. This systematic review (SR) aimed to identify and summarise real-world evidence (RWE) related to the patient burden/experience and economic burden of HDFN.
methodsElectronic database searches supplemented by handsearching of grey literature, were conducted to identify studies that reported the clinical patient burden/experience, and economic burden of HDFN in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). Data from eligible studies were summarised in a narrative synthesis due to heterogeneity between studies.
resultsA total of 26 relevant publications were identified for inclusion in the SR, consisting of one study that directly measured Health Related Quality of Life, 9 studies reporting on proxy outcomes for patient burden and 18 studies reporting on economic burden (this includes two double-counted studies reporting more than one outcome type). Neurodevelopment, academic development, behaviour and personality were assessed as proxy outcomes for patient burden given the limited identification of patient-reported outcome data. These studies suggested potential neurodevelopmental impairments in children with HDFN. Despite these indirect insights into patient burden, identified data were limited and results should be interpreted with consideration of the inherent heterogeneity in design and endpoints assessed across RWE studies. Economic burden data were primarily limited to healthcare resource use outcomes, with limited reported data on healthcare costs, it is difficult to draw notable conclusions on the true economic burden of HDFN.
conclusionsThe current SR provides a clear summary of the available evidence for the patient experience and economic burden of HDFN. While the limited evidence indicates that HDFN does confer a significant burden on patients, the review identifies the need for further well-powered and representative observational studies using well-defined outcome measures to aid a greater understanding of the burden and experience of HDFN.
trial registrationThe protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO CRD42022328444.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.