Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905353›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Clinical outcomes of asynchronous telerehabilitation through a mobile app are equivalent to synchronous telerehabilitation in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized control study.

Eren Timurtaş, İrem Hüzmeli, İlkşan Demirbüken, Mine Gülden Polat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06299527 (Clinical Outcomes of Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Are Equivalent to Synchronous Telerehabilitation in Patients With Fibromyalgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06299527 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Outcomes of Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Are Equivalent to Synchronous Telerehabilitation in Patients With Fibromyalgia: a Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled66ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsExercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eren TimurtaşDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-4327
İrem HüzmeliDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Tayfur Ata Sökmen Campus, Faculty of Health Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Alahan-Antakya/Hatay, Turkey. ihuzmeli@mku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-6016
İlkşan DemirbükenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-5784
Mine Gülden PolatDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-9740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the effectiveness of exercise therapy delivered via a smartphone mobile app, using asynchronous video-based tools, with synchronous telerehabilitation models using videoconferencing for individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

methodsThe research, utilizing a randomized clinical study design, involves sixty-six FMS patients in an 8-week exercise program. Participants are divided into synchronous (n: 33) and asynchronous (n: 33) groups. Assessments, pain intensity (VAS), functional limitations (FIQr), health-related quality of life (SF 12), catastrophizing (PCS), anxiety and depression (HADS), functional capacity (6MWT), muscle strength (Arm curl test), and joint position sense (LI-RATT), are conducted at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), end of treatment (week 8).

resultsNo significant group-time interaction was found for total VAS, FIQ, SF 12, PCS, HADS, 6MWT, Arm curl tests, LI-RATT extension, LI-RATT flexion, LI-RATT right rotation scores (p > 0.05). Significant effects of time and interactions between groups and time were observed in the neck (p = 0.010, ES = 0.19) and back region (p = 0.039, ES = 0.19) of the Visual Analog Scale, left rotation score of the LI-RATT (p = 0.008, ES = 0.36), and HADS Anxiety Score (p = 0.029, ES = 0.31). Group differences were significant at all-time points for the outcomes (p < 0.001), except for the right rotation of LI-RATT (p = 0.633).

conclusionThe study suggests that asynchronous telerehabilitation is comparable to synchronous methods in addressing pain, quality of life, and other factors in FMS patients. The asynchronous approach may offer advantages in reducing the burden on healthcare professionals and being cost-effective. Future research should explore diverse telerehabilitation protocols and their impact on overall care burdens.

trial registrationNCT06299527 (01/03/2024).

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFibromyalgiaMobile ApplicationsTelerehabilitationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeVideoconferencingExerciseFibromyalgiaMobile healthTelemedicineTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39905353
PMCPMC11796233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.