Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905325›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Global birth prevalence of major congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiaolong Xie, Jiao Pei, Li Zhang, Yang Wu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaolong Xie *Department of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Jiao PeiDepartmentof Clinical Research, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. zhanglihk@126.com.
Yang WuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. wuyang_westchina@hotmail.com.

Funding

the Postdoctor Research Fund of West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2024HXBH152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of systematic review on the global prevalence of major congenital anomalies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies on global birth prevalence of eight major congenital anomalies (esophageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, duodenal atresia, intestinal atresia, gastroschisis, omphalocele, Hirschsprung's disease and anorectal malformation).

methodsPopulation-based studies reporting the birth prevalence of these anomalies were included from 1969 to 2024. Data from eligible studies were pooled in meta-analysis to get global estimates of birth prevalence and prevalence in subgroups of geographic regions, countries with varying income levels and time periods.

resultsOne hundred and twenty-three studies including a total of 256,507 cases of congenital anomalies and 769,455,220 births were included in this study. Overall birth prevalence of theses eight anomalies ranged from 0.86 to 3.11 cases per 10,000 births. Anorectal malformation had the highest birth prevalence among these anomalies with 3.11 cases (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.77-3.50) per 10,000 births. Birth prevalence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia had a great decrease from 4.19 per 10,000 births in the 1960s to 1.30 per 10,000 births in the 2020s. Omphalocele had high prevalence in Africa and low-income countries.

conclusionThis systematic review summarizes birth prevalence of eight major congenital anomalies. The burdens of these anomalies had variations in the world. Information of this study could help with better understanding of epidemiology and etiology of these anomalies.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesGlobal HealthHernias, Diaphragmatic, CongenitalHumansInfant, NewbornPrevalenceCongenital anomaliesGlobal birth prevalenceMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39905325
PMCPMC11796082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.